📊 Stakeholder Dashboard (M6)
A static aggregation of who the platform serves, what each group actually needs, and which module answers it. No inference, no tracking — just an honest table.
6stakeholder groups
6case studies covered
4.40/5average feedback score
| Stakeholder | What they care about | What they need | Module | Feedback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🎒 Students | Clear, visual, low-bandwidth learning material that fits a school project. | Simple explanations, relatable examples, zero cost. | M1 / M2 | 4.6/5 |
| 📚 Teachers | Case studies that map cleanly onto the science and social-studies syllabus. | Citable facts, printable summaries, classroom-ready questions. | M2 | 4.4/5 |
| 🏛️ Municipal bodies | Local solution mapping and collection data. | Ward-level plastic volumes, segregation routes, vendor directories. | M5 | 4.1/5 |
| 🌍 NGOs | Accurate microplastic and ocean data with traceable sources. | Source links, definitions, and conservative language. | M2 / M6 | 4.8/5 |
| 🏭 Recyclers & MSMEs | Steady, segregated feedstock supply. | Resin-wise volumes, contamination limits, offtake contacts. | M5 | 4.0/5 |
| 🏆 Hackathon judges | Modular architecture, honest AI usage, and green-computing discipline. | Module table, deployment notes, clear licensing. | All | 4.5/5 |
Data honesty noteFeedback scores come from a small, self-reported class-level survey and are included to show the dashboard layout. Treat them as illustrative, not as a representative study.